Downloads[Click here]
Detecting Speed with Different Sizes of Images
Since the high-level linguistics descriptions are used to model porn features in images,
image with messy details that similar to porn features will take more time to process.
The processing speed of PornSeer Pro to images is not exactly fixed for every image of the
same size. The following results sometimes show PornSeer Pro can process a bigger simple
image much fast than a smaller messy image.
Since the correlation between different frames of a video clip can be high in a typical adult video clip, to detect a video of 1000 frames is much fast than to detect 1000 individual images of the same size. Based on the natural of the video clips, the speeding factor can range from anywhere between 10 to 100.
| 1. PornSeer Pro V.1.0.1.6 Released 4/25/2006 |
Test 1: Medium Speed Laptop |
| Settings: Gateway 4552GP Laptop PC, Intel Pentium M 1.60GHz, 512MB of RAM, 80G 4300rpm HD |
|
320x240, 6 images in HD, average 0.08096667 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0006], Time used=[0.781000]s, Total Pixels=[492480] Images Detected=[0060], Time used=[5.458000]s, Total Pixels=[4924800] Images Detected=[0600], Time used=[48.580002]s, Total Pixels=[49248000] 640x480, 7 images in HD, average 0.3140943 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0007], Time used=[2.664000]s, Total Pixels=[2150400] Images Detected=[0070], Time used=[22.672001]s, Total Pixels=[21504000] Images Detected=[0700], Time used=[219.866010]s, Total Pixels=[215040000] 1024x768, 3 images in HD, average 0.49080669 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0003], Time used=[1.863000]s, Total Pixels=[2359296] Images Detected=[0030], Time used=[14.962001]s, Total Pixels=[23592960] Images Detected=[0300], Time used=[147.242007]s, Total Pixels=[235929600] 1280x1024, 1 images in HD, average 0.61038003 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0001], Time used=[0.821000]s, Total Pixels=[1310720] Images Detected=[0010], Time used=[6.689000]s, Total Pixels=[13107200] Images Detected=[0100], Time used=[61.038003]s, Total Pixels=[131072000] |
Test 2: Slow Desktop PC |
| Settings: Intel Pentium 4, 1.50GHz, 512 MB of RAM, 80G 7200rpm HD, Desktop PC, Win XP. |
|
320x240, 6 images in HD, average 0.1637 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0006], Time used=[1.281000]s, Total Pixels=[492480] Images Detected=[0060], Time used=[10.328000]s, Total Pixels=[4924800] Images Detected=[0600], Time used=[98.219005]s, Total Pixels=[49248000] 640x480, 7 images in HD, average 0.5937286 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0007], Time used=[4.953000]s, Total Pixels=[2150400] Images Detected=[0070], Time used=[43.734002]s, Total Pixels=[21504000] Images Detected=[0700], Time used=[415.610020]s, Total Pixels=[215040000] 1024x768, 3 images in HD, average 1.03296671667 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0003], Time used=[5.125000]s, Total Pixels=[2359296] Images Detected=[0030], Time used=[43.765002]s, Total Pixels=[23592960] Images Detected=[0300], Time used=[309.890015]s, Total Pixels=[157286400] 1280x1024, 1 images in HD, average 1.36921007 seconds/per image Images Detected=[0001], Time used=[1.860000]s, Total Pixels=[1310720] Images Detected=[0010], Time used=[14.156001]s, Total Pixels=[13107200] Images Detected=[0100], Time used=[136.921007]s, Total Pixels=[131072000] |
| Issues of false alarm rate and hit rate go here. |